|
Wealth Matters
Advisors like Myra Salzer are not standing pat in
helping clients with their estate and tax planning,
despite uncertainty over the Administration’s plans.
Here’s how your peers are taking action now.

Melanie Waddell and Robert F. Keane
While the outcomes of the healthcare and financial
services reform debates now in high gear in Washington
will have pivotal effects on advisors this year and into
next, lawmakers have yet to weigh in on another vital
issue of importance to advisors and their clients:
whether to let the estate tax expire in 2010. If
Congress fails to act this year, the current tax rate of
45% for assets above $3.5 million will expire in 2010,
and return at higher rates in 2011. Come 2011, the
previous exclusion of $1 million returns, and the top
rate for assets above that amount would revert back to
the 55% level set in 2001.
The fate of the estate tax lies in the hands of the
Senate Finance Committee and its chairman, Max Baucus
(D-Montana). While Baucus has been embroiled in
healthcare reform, a spokesman for the Senator told
Investment Advisor that the Senate Finance Committee
chairman knows that action on the estate tax this year
is a "must-do proposition," as a result of the Bush-era
rates resetting. That said, however, Congress’s
prolonged indecision (at press time in mid-September
lawmakers had still not gotten even close to rendering a
decision) has left advisors paralyzed in helping clients
with their estates. "To invite a client to put together
an estate plan that could be invalid in a few months is
a tough sell," says Myra Salzer, president and founder
of The Wealth Conservancy in Boulder, Colorado.
But like other advisors (more about which later), Salzer
isn’t sitting on her hands when it comes to estate
planning for clients. Her way of dealing with estate
planning for clients now—and not waste their money by
drawing up what will likely be a temporary estate
plan—is to help clients organize their estates, and
those of family members, through a product she created
called EstateLogic. Not only is Salzer the founder of
Wealth Conservancy, she also established in 2005
Executor’s Resource, Inc., and is the brainchild behind
two of the firm’s products—EstateLogic, launched in
October 2008, as well as the yet-to-be-released
ExecutorLogic, which is due out in 2010.
More than 100 advisors use EstateLogic now, and Salzer
says she expects that number to jump to thousands of
users by the end of the year. Not only are advisors
drawn to the product, but "we are getting interest [in
EstateLogic] from the insurance and employee benefits
industries, as well as financial service providers,"
Salzer says. EstateLogic is an online tool that advisors
and their clients can use to gather, store, update, and
share information about the client’s estate and legacy.
As Carl "Skip" Rapp, president and CEO of Executor’s
Resource, puts it: EstateLogic’s role "is to bring all
of the relevant information of the estate together, and
that really extends from documents, to financials, to
legacy, and personal instructions you want to leave
behind." Salzer says EstateLogic is a great way for
advisors to "build rapport with their clients" and offer
them a service that will help them "retain a client’s
assets under management after the client dies." Salzer
cites a report conducted by Allianz which showed that
80% of clients’ heirs, including the surviving spouse,
leave their advisors after the death of a client. "But
if the advisor is involved in helping to settle an
estate, if all of the executor’s needs are on one
software package that’s co-branded with the advisor,
that’s an instant way to build rapport and serve" the
client’s entire family, she says. Recall, too, that
Salzer, a member of the Investment Advisor Leaders
Council, first came to prominence as an expert on
understanding and serving wealthy families.
By offering EstateLogic to their clients, advisors
provide a valuable service to an executor of an estate,
"because the executor has no idea what they are in for,"
Salzer says. Adds Rapp: "About 90% of executors are
close family members or friends, and they are not
prepared for the amount of work involved."
Rita Johnson, a planner with The Millstone Evans Group
of Raymond James and Associates, says her firm is in the
process of rolling out EstateLogic to its clients. "It
seems like every few weeks we have a client who’s
facing" being the executor of an estate, she says. The
"biggest benefit" of using EstateLogic, Johnson says, is
that it "will enable us to deepen our relationship with
clients. We’re not estate planning attorneys, but it’s
very important as the advisor that we do the
comprehensive financial planning, and that we help
people make sure they have their ducks in a row so they
are prepared down the line."
Another benefit about EstateLogic, Johnson says, is that
"it’s not just about estate planning; it’s possible for
our clients to store [other] documents that they may
need." For instance, she says, "older baby boomers in
transition, who may be partially retired, tend to be
moving around a lot—they may have two homes—so they can
access their documents regardless of where they are."
Amy McDuffee, director of channel planning at Executor’s
Resource, notes that The Millstone Evans Group is taking
"a unique approach in that as part of the service
offering, they will actually be scanning and uploading
documents for clients into EstateLogic." McDuffee adds
that Executor’s Resource provides "flexibility in how
advisors can offer EstateLogic to clients. The client
account fee can be paid for by the practice, or
self-paid by the client." McDuffee says the "middle of
the road" version of EstateLogic costs about $11 per
month or $129 per year. "The advisor can choose to pay
that fee or just make [EstateLogic] available and
recommend that his clients pay for it."
As for ExecutorLogic, Salzer is in the late stages of
raising money to develop the product, which she says
will function "like a TurboTax kind of solution for
executors to settle estates." Rapp adds that
ExecutorLogic will be "more of a workflow tool than an
aggregation tool" like EstateLogic. "The role of the
executor is different: he or she has a finite task and
that is to settle an estate within a certain amount of
time." ExecutorLogic, Salzer says, "will enable an
executor from their desk to settle an estate in multiple
states within the U.S. without any experience and save
thousands of dollars on legal and accounting fees."
Now let’s turn our attention to the broader issues of
taxation, on which everyone seems to have an opinion.
The IRS even has a page on its Web site filled with tax
quotes, mostly humorous, from an array of notables
including Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. ("Taxes are what we
pay for a civilized society."), Albert Einstein ("The
hardest thing in the world to understand is the income
tax."), and the ever-popular Unknown ("People who
complain about taxes can be divided into two classes:
men and women."). For most advisors, however, tax talk
has never been more serious.
With an expected $1.6 trillion deficit for the fiscal
year ended September 30 and the Obama Administration
forecasting a deficit in excess of $9 trillion over the
next decade, no one grounded in reality is talking about
tax cuts. There are numerous measures to be taken up by
the current Congress that will have tax implications for
advisors and their clients including, but not limited
to: healthcare reform, carbon cap and trade policy, the
estate tax, and capital gains tax rates. While no one
knows for certain what the future tax picture will look
like (see The Scope of the Problem sidebar, in which
attorney John Scroggin paints a picture of what likely
will happen), a number of advisors around the country
have been working with their clients to make the most of
the current situation.
President Obama certainly got the attention of Ben
Ledyard, director of wealth strategies for Boston-based
Silver Bridge Advisors and head of the firm’s new
Wilmington, Delaware office, when during his healthcare
address to Congress on September 9 he indicated that
whatever reform was ultimately arrived at should not add
another cent to the deficit. "This is going to be
expensive, so if we’re not going to borrow against it,
who’s going to pay for it?" Ledyard asks. "Ultimately we
know that some effective tax hikes are going to come."
Alan Weinstein, a CPA with more than 30 years experience
and a founding partner of RWE Private Wealth, a new
wealth management firm in Orlando, agrees
wholeheartedly. "The big issue right now is trying to
plan for tax rate changes in both the income tax area
and the estate tax area," he says.
Not Standing By Idly
"Wealthy people have to get the best after-tax return
and the most tax-efficient return they can get," says
Keith Springer, who runs his Capital Financial Advisory
Services out of Sacramento. "The key for most wealthy
people is not to lose your money. Their benchmarks are
purchasing power, inflation, and taxes and they really
shouldn’t be concerned about beating the market. As a
money manager, it’s up to me to take care of it."
Carrie Coghill Kuntz, president of D.B. Root & Co.
Wealth Management in Pittsburgh, says there are a number
of steps advisors can take right now to help their
clients avoid future taxes. "We’re looking at portfolios
and where we have appreciated assets, really taking
gains off the table and paying the taxes now," she says.
She also notes that if future tax rates are expected to
be higher, then deferring taxes on retirement savings
may not always be the best idea. "We want our clients to
be taking advantage of all the matching that their
401(k) plans and so forth offer, but we’re not so quick
to say, ‘Max out your plan!’ any more."
One of the issues that Kuntz expects to be important to
clients over the next few years will be Roth 401(k)s and
Roth IRA conversions. She’s not alone in that thinking.
"I’m in the process of reaching out to clients that I
think would benefit from a Roth conversion or a
multi-year conversion strategy now that most people’s
IRAs are dramatically lower than they were two years
ago," says Cathy Pareto of Cathy Pareto Associates in
Coral Gables, Florida. "You get a little bit of hemming
and hawing when you tell them what you’re doing is
advancing the tax payment on it, and for some of the
less sophisticated investors you have to explain why
this is a good time to consider it."
She says that once clients understand that in all
likelihood tax rates will be higher in the next few
years, and she crunches the numbers to show them the
impact that strategy could have on their total wealth,
they start to get it. Pareto stresses, however, that the
strategy only makes sense if the client has the ability
to pay that tax from another source.
"Assuming that in a couple of years our rates will be
higher, we have to re-think tax deferral," Pareto
observes. "Is tax deferral really that important if tax
rates down the road might be at 40% or 45%? What I
recommend to people who might be in a crappy plan is
just to fund up to where you get the maximum employer
match. Get your free money and then maybe consider
funding outside of that in tax-sensitive funds."
Like Kuntz in Pittsburgh, Pareto is also advising
clients to take some of their gains off the table now.
"It’s not a question of if we’re going to have higher
tax rates, it’s when and for whom, really," she says.
Pareto says there has been some talk within the
Administration of bumping the capital gains rate back to
20%, which is not an unreasonable assumption. So she’s
suggesting to some clients who have booked some losses
over the last few years to start to offset them with
gains. "Where they have embedded gains from previous
years, they could book those gains now at 15% and then
buy [the same securities] back, so going forward we’ve
minimized what they would pay at 20%," she explains.
"The interesting part of that is unlike when you’re
booking a capital loss, like for tax loss harvesting at
the end of the year, there’s nothing that would preclude
you from buying that security right back. There’s no
wash rule there. There’s nothing that says you can’t buy
it right back because you booked a gain."
Don’t Leave It to the IRS
Advisors are also not waiting around to see what the
shape of the new estate taxes will be. "We’ve known
since 2001 that the estate tax laws were in flux," notes
Kuntz. "We’ve also known coming out of last year that
with such wealth destruction we had to revisit the
estate planning paths that our clients have been on,"
she says, bemoaning the continued lack of clarity from
Washington. In the meantime, her firm has been looking
at client income and outlays and looking at estate
planning tools currently in place, such as second-to-die
life insurance policies, to determine if they’re still
viable.
"The estate tax is due to sunset January 1," notes
Weinstein. "Nobody really believes that’s going to
happen. It will probably end up that there’s a $3.5
million exemption per person and it will be taxed at a
high rate of 45%. That’s similar to what we have today."
"A $3.5 million per person estate exemption, that’s a
reasonable number, as long as it doesn’t go back to $1
million or $2 million," agrees Springer. "At $7 million
per couple, that covers most people, but you’re always
looking for proper estate planning. You always want to
make sure it’s passed on to the right person, it’s set
up in the right kind of trust. That’s the key."
Among the estate planning tools that Weinstein favors
are family limited partnerships, and grantor retained
annuity trusts (GRATs). "The beauty of a family
partnership is that if done right, you maintain control
over it, whereas with some of these other techniques you
literally have to give up control to pull it out of your
estate," he says. "One other thing that’s worth noting
is that in a lot of these, especially family
partnerships, you get a leverage factor by discounting
the value of what you give to your relatives, based on
typically two things—a minority-interest discount and a
lack-of-marketability discount.
Under a GRAT, the individual making the grant puts
assets expected to increase in value into a trust and
receives annuity income from that trust for a specified
period. At the end of that term, the assets become a
taxable gift to the beneficiary. In a recent note, the
California Society of CPAs explained that "tax savings
are achieved because the annuity payments are calculated
to result in a gift tax value of zero. It’s anticipated,
however, that the actual interest earned will be higher
than the 7520 rate (the current IRS interest rate, which
changes monthly, also known as the Applicable Federal
Rate, or AFR), leaving a substantial value in the GRAT
at the end of the term." That value is then passed on to
the beneficiaries tax free.
"For a GRAT to work, the person who makes the gift has
to survive the term of the trust," Weinstein continues.
"If not, there’s really ‘no harm, no foul,’ other than
the cost of the documents and putting the thing
together, so it just comes back into your estate as if
you did nothing." As important as taxes are to consider,
one thing that both Weinstein and Ledyard warn about is
"letting the tax tail wag the investment dog." "If a
stock is $100 today, and it’s run up since March 9,
obviously you can realize that gain today for 15%, but
if you thought there was a little more run in the market
and you liked the stock, and ultimately you think it
could go up to $120, you’re still netting a higher rate
of return," says Ledyard. "I would say to any client
with over a 5% exposure to any one position, or even an
asset class, certainly now is a good time to take
advantage of what we know are lower tax rates. We’ve had
a pretty good run in the market and I always say,
‘There’s never a good time not to diversify."
"First it’s got to make good investment sense and then
it’s got to make good tax sense," agrees Weinstein.
"I’ve been practicing as a CPA since 1977, and when I
started practicing, the rate on ordinary
income—dividends, interest, partnership income—was 70%.
And we had a 50% tax on earned income. When you look
back to that, we have a long way to go and we did all
right then. Everybody gets all upset about tax rates,
and nobody wants to pay any more than they have to, but
compared to what I can remember, it doesn’t scare me. I
don’t think there’s a political stomach to go much over
40%, so if a deal can make money and you get to keep 60%
of it…that doesn’t trouble me."
Keith Springer is President of Capital Financial Advisory Services, a registered investment advisor,
providing Wealth Management and Mortgage Consulting
Services. For more information on how to build and
maintain a solid retirement plan, please contact Keith
Springer at 916-925-8900 or
Keith@KeithSpringer.com
|